Child Porn Investigation North Las Vegas Mayor John Lee
Follow me
Child Porn Investigation North Las Vegas Mayor John Lee
Outgoing North Las Vegas Police Chief Joseph Chronister has admitted that child porn on NLV Mayor John Lee’s iPad was not properly investigated and was instead deleted by a detective.

In North Las Vegas, the outgoing police chief, Joseph Chronister, admitted in May that NLV Mayor John Lee received special treatment and that special treatment was based on his position and his ability to affect “certain aspects” of the NLVPD. This special treatment took place during an investigation, which began after the mayor asked police officers working at city hall for assistance in removing child porn from his iPad.

NLVPD Chief Joseph Chronister
Former Chief Joseph Chronister

Mayor Lee claimed that the child porn was on his tablet because “a hacker” sent it to him in an email. However, during the investigation no such email was found and the browser history showed that the iPad had been used to access illegal porn sites that included what appeared to be child porn.

In addition, a week prior to approaching the officer about the iPad, the mayor made what was described as an odd request for help with “debugging a phone” in a voicemail to the Chief. As a result, some have speculated that the hacker sending an email story was just an excuse concocted to hide the true source, possibly amid fear that the incriminating material would eventually be found.

In a statement to the Las Vegas Review Journal shortly after his retirement, Former Chief Chronister stated that the detective assigned to the investigation did an incomplete investigation, didn’t follow up on inconsistent evidence uncovered during that investigation, and later took the mayor’s iPad to an Apple Store to have its memory wiped, before returning it to the mayor.

Via the LVRJ:

North Las Vegas police got the case after the mayor asked the department for help removing what he believed to be child pornography from his personal iPad. A detective helped out but didn’t check any of the mayor’s other electronic devices or press Lee on why his story didn’t make sense in light of evidence found, a police report filed last year shows.

Asked if anyone else would have been treated the same way, the chief said the short answer is no.

“We’re talking about the mayor of North Las Vegas,” Chronister said. “He is a person of authority. He is a person of power. He absolutely has the ability to control certain aspects of our department.”

That includes who the chief of police is.

NLV Mayor John Lee
North Las Vegas Mayor John Lee (right)

The “investigation” lasted all of one day, apparently included no questions about the lack of that email or the presence of the porn sites in Mayor Lee’s browser history, didn’t include any attempt to investigate if other devices under his control also contained such material, and concluded with Detective Mark Hoyt “going above and beyond” to make sure any incriminating evidence was thoroughly wiped out of the iPad’s memory at the Apple Store.

Hoyt’s excuse for not doing a complete investigation was that the apparent children on the porn site were from a different country and therefore he couldn’t determine their age. Chronister, who was in fact later replaced as NLV police chief by Mayor Lee anyway, now says he wishes his department had done more.

Meanwhile, Joseph Dooley, a retired FBI agent who previously ran Connecticut’s computer crimes task force, agrees they should have done more. Among other things, he states (in the same article) that the country where the porn sites originated from should not have kept them from conducting an investigation into what appears to be kiddie porn, that the iPad should have been seized immediately, and that the email story “couldn’t have happened as the mayor described.”

Dooley also classifies Det. Hoyt’s trip to the Apple Store to have the memory wiped as “bizarre.” Instead, they should have consulted the District Attorney‘s Office to determine if there was probable cause to seize other devices and investigate if they contained similar material.

Las Vegas area police departments have been no stranger to sex based crimes lately, including two members of the LVMPD being arrested for child porn. Beyond that, another Metro detective was just given a light sentence after he attacked a prostitute when she tried to raise the price on him, yet another has been accused of sexually assaulting a woman during a domestic violence call, a Clark County Court Marshall groped a woman in court and then had her arrested for reporting it to a judge, and the former head of the Las Vegas Constable’s Office was caught covering up one of his underling’s illegal use of the department’s background check system to find personal information about his favorite adult film stars.

When you have police chiefs openly admitting that they gave special treatment to city officials and that that special treatment was predicated on the fact that “He is a person of authority. He is a person of power. He absolutely has the ability to control certain aspects of our department” that’s the kind of results you end up with. Especially when you pair that with a district attorney who’s literally never seen a police shooting he couldn’t justify. The fact that Former Chief Chronister could come out with an admission like that and not even really cause much of stir actually tells you a lot about “accountability” among the police and public officials in Las Vegas.

Related Content on NVCopBlock.org:

Share on Tumblr

17 Comments

  1. The article said there were 3 links to porn sites, two legal and one “possibly illegal.”

    There is a statutory difference in cases like this. If the images were downloaded and saved, that is a stronger case for “possession” than a link or something in a cache file. I think in NV is also a specific intent crime as well.

    You’d have to post the report to see the chronology of what happened. I guess a jury would asked why would someone who was in possession of anything potentially illegal willingly go to the police? Especially knowing it will be a matter of public record.

    “……No intent

    If your criminal defense attorney can prove that you did not “knowingly” promote, advertise or possess child pornography, then a Nevada court cannot convict you of child porn crimes in Nevada……”

    1. By the chief’s own words, he got preferential treatment.

      As for an accidental visit to one site? That is believable. Some predatory sites will bounce you all over hell and worse. Usually to other pornography sites that hose your browser if you try to exit. It becomes a vicious circle of attack for not paying them. My advice there is hard shut down of the computer.
      ANY internet search, however innocent, runs that risk. That is why antivirus is so important, and still not 100% protection.

  2. What a sicko. Chronister’s been a cop for 24 years, so you know you can trust him.

    1. Trust him to let a man in power off with crimes?

  3. One person is saying the mayor did this and he is retired.

    2. Are you afraid someone is going to roll on you?

  4. what a cesspool of shit. THe people involved is what I’m referring to. On a side note, they should start going after the people who produce child porn just as much or more than the people who view it.

  5. OMG!!!! HOW MUCH MORE DO WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THESE AUTHORITARIAN HYPOCRITES!!!! WHERE IS THE FEDERAL INVESTIGATION???!!!








Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *