Tag Archives: maine

Maine Cop Facing 20 Sexual Assault Charges, Including Against Six Year Old, Gets Misdemeanor Plea Deal, $1000 Fine

Sexual Assault Charges Misdemeanor Plea Deal Deputy Kenneth Hatch

Maine Sheriff’s Deputy Kenneth Hatch facing 20 charges of sexual assault of a minor, including one who was six years old at the time was given a misdemeanor plea deal and a $1,000 fine.

Lincoln County Sheriff’s Deputy Kenneth L. Hatch III was facing 20 charges of sexual assault against three minors, including one who was just six years old at the time. However, instead of refiling charges after his first trial ended in a hung jury, the Maine Attorney General’s Office offered him a plea bargain. And, boy, what a bargain it was!

As part of the plea deal Hatch agreed to plead guilty to the Class D misdemeanor (almost the lowest level of crime someone can be charged with) of “furnishing a place for minors to consume alcohol.” In exchange for that, the prosecutor has agreed that his “punishment” will consist of a $1,000 fine. No jail time, no probation, no sex offender registry, not even a series of overpriced classes to sit through. It’s slightly worse than if he had received a traffic citation.

At this point, it’s hard to be surprised when cops sit back and cover for their “Brothas” no matter how heinous the crime might be. Nor is it particularly shocking anymore when prosecutors give them their “Policeman’s Discount” and they get just a slap on the wrist or the crimes committed by “Police Heroes” are overlooked altogether. This takes the cake, though.

Note: If you have videos, stories, upcoming events/protests, or personal interactions with the police (and/or “justice” system) that you would like to share, send them to us and we will do everything we can to bring it to the attention of the world. In addition, you can visit the Nevada Cop Block resources section for information and links to the rights of citizens when dealing with police, during which you should always be filming.

Lincoln County Sheriffs Deputy Kenneth Hatch

Former Lincoln County Sheriff’s Deputy of the Year Kenneth L. Hatch III

Obviously, one would think that someone facing charges of sexually abusing multiple underage children, including one who was only six years old at the time, would get several books thrown at them.

Via the PressHerald.com:

On and off for the last 16 years, prosecutors allege, Hatch preyed on teenage girls, all the while moving through the ranks of law enforcement in central Maine.

An indictment handed up in August accused Hatch, 46, of 22 felonies, including 11 counts of sexual abuse of a minor, eight counts of aggravated furnishing of marijuana to a minor, and two counts of unlawful sexual contact. In many of the incidents, Hatch was on duty when the alleged abuse occurred.

Via the Bangor Daily News:

The drug counts allege that Hatch gave marijuana from a bag marked “EVIDENCE” to two of his three alleged victims, two of whom were 14 or 15 at the time of the alleged assaults.

The alleged sexual assaults against the third victim, which resulted in Hatch’s arrest in June, reportedly first occurred in 2004 when she was 6, Assistant Attorney General John Risler, who is prosecuting the case, told the grand jury in August. The indictments allege that Hatch then sexually assaulted the same girl and provided her marijuana in 2013 and 2014, when she was 14 and 15.

One would obviously be very wrong, though. Apparently, in Maine the Magical Uniforms they issue to cops are especially potent at rendering them impervious to any sort of meaningful consequences for their actions. Of course, one of his victims spoke of her fears in relation to that and how it made her reluctant to come forward. (Via the PressHerald.com, again.)

One of the alleged victims who spoke with the Maine Sunday Telegram said Hatch used his power as a police officer to sexually abuse her over a period of years. She was afraid to speak up, she said, because it would be her word against his.

“He’s a cop,” she said. “Who’s going to believe me?”

Finally in June, she spoke up and told a family member, triggering the investigation and Hatch’s arrest.

Her fear of speaking out is common among victims of police sexual violence. For every victim who comes forward to accuse an officer, five more remain silent, said Philip M. Stinson, a professor of criminal justice at Bowling Green State University and a leading researcher on police misconduct.

“There’s something about that power dynamic,” Stinson said. “Police officers are used to being in charge, of telling people what to do, and of people obeying them – or there are consequences.”

I’m sure that this sentence will alleviate those fears:

“Hatch will appear before Stokes in Knox County Superior Court on Friday morning, agree to pay a $1,000 fine, and will serve no jail time.”

Related Posts

Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte’s “War On Drugs” is the Police State U.S. Policy Makers Dream Of

This post was written by  and originally published at the Center For a Stateless Society (C4SS) under the title “Why Duterte’s Drug War Can Happen Here and How To Stop It” Posts and other content you think are worth sharing with the CopBlock Network can be sent in to us via the CopBlock.org Submissions Page. Some tips to make it more likely that your submission will get posted to the CopBlock Network can be found here.

(Note: This has been posted in its original form and no edits to the original text were made. Some links may have been added within the text and images have been added. In addition, the conclusions expressed within this initial introductory summary represent my own interpretation of what is being stated within Ryan’s writings.)

In the post below, Ryan discusses the current drug policies with in the Philippines and how it coincides with the desires of those within the United States government who created and then perpetuated the “War on Drugs.” As explained by Ryan, the reality is that those behind the drug policies in this country wish that they could use Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s tactics and in many cases have stated as much publicly.

Why Duterte’s Drug War Can Happen Here and How To Stop It

Rodrigo Duterte’s drug war in the Philippines is unique in its policy of extrajudicial murder of all drug dealers and users. It’s as much a cleansing of one’s population as any genocide. Still, I think Americans should understand that the logic underlying Duterte’s drug war isn’t dissimilar to ours. Once you’ve declared a “war” on an entire group of people, dehumanization is inevitable. The continued existence of drug criminals is seen as a burden and their non-compliance a violent threat. It wasn’t all that long ago Ronald Reagan characterized the drug war as not simply a matter of law and order, but a national security concern. Only 4 presidential administrations ago, in the early 90s, George H.W. Bush’s drug czar William Bennett said he had no issue with beheading drug dealers in public. Infamous chief of the LAPD Daryl Gates said that any drug offense is tantamount to treason and should be punished with the death penalty.

Even now there’s propaganda equating those who buy and sell drugs with terrorists deserving of death. Just this year Maine governor Paul Lepage unapologetically called for the guillotining of drug users on TV. Ronald Reagan’s characterization of drug crime as a matter of national security is to this day the official DEA position. The rather flimsy empirical connection between drug sales and funding of terrorism only gains serious currency in the national discourse because we’re conditioned to view these “criminals” as dangerous. Turning peaceful market participants into threats helps distract from the real enabler of foreign terrorists and criminal cartels’ drug profits: Drug laws.

What is happening in the Philippines is the logic behind all drug wars carried out to its terrifying conclusion. They are only unique in their consistency. What’s happening there can happen here. Trump has voiced his support for Duterte’s tactics and he’s appointed one of the most extreme Nixonian throwback drug warriors to be the most powerful prosecutor in the country. But what Trump lacks is a complicit population; so please, be more vocal in helping humanize people who are simply making a living or trying to enjoy themselves the same way hundreds of millions of Americans do legally — by being intoxicated. Do not rest content with the progress our culture has made, because it can disappear.

There’s been a groundswell of support for ending the criminalization of drugs the past few years, but we must look beyond legalization efforts. These attitudes on drugs aren’t determined by the laws. The laws are determined by the attitudes. We are told more and more to view drug use as a medical problem, but this too takes away the agency of most people who use drugs, who are not addicts and are otherwise unhealthy. Duterte too has characterized drug use as a sickness, so don’t assume the medical approach is purely a liberal narrative. One effective way to get rid of a disease people are willingly infecting themselves with is to kill those people off. So do not compromise the dignity and the normalization of peaceful drug use. The real solution to addiction is to treat addiction, and we can’t do that while all drug users are cast out into the shadows.

Innocent Men Cleaning Up The Side of Highway Unnecessarily Harassed By Maine State Trooper

The following post was shared with the CopBlock Network by Louis C. Johnson III, via the CopBlock.org Submissions Page. It details how Johnson, his uncle, and his boss were “protected and served” by a Maine State Trooper after they stopped on the side of the highway to remove a discarded dryer from a ditch next to the road.

Instead of appreciating the good deed they were performing at the time, Johnson says that Trooper Bronson harassed and belittled them unnecessarily. He also says that Bronson accused them of having drugs without any sort of evidence beyond his refusal to consent to a search of his vehicle.

Date Of Incident: June 6, 2016
Officer Involved: State Trooper Eric Bronson
Department Involved: Maine State Police, Troop C, Skowhegan, ME
Phone Number: (207) 624-7200
Facebook Page: Maine State Police Headquarters
Twitter Account: @MEStatePolice
Internal Affairs: Contact Us

Around 1:30 p.m. on Monday June 6th 2016 near the Athens/Cornville town line on route 150 South, my uncle,my boss, and I were on our way back from my residence in which we were picking up parts for my line striping machine, when we saw on the right hand side of the road in the ditch someone had thrown a whole busted up dryer. We all agreed that we would stop and pick it up, for some people have no respect for the town or the environment to just discard their broken dryer in the ditch of a main road.

So, we proceeded to all get out and load it into my 2005 Ford F150. It was at that moment that a Maine State Trooper drove by us going north on route 150. He was traveling at a very slow rate of speed, even though the speed limit is 50 mph, until he was out of sight.

By that time, we had the dryer loaded into. Then State Trooper Eric Bronson came back and pulled up behind us, stepping out of his car and walking up to us. One of us said, “hello sir, what can we help you with? He asked us what we were doing, but it was obviously clear what we were up to in broad daylight on the side of a busy road.

In my eyes, this officer was already just looking to “make a bust”. This could also have been because in the passenger seat of his cruiser there was a female individual. I could not tell if she was an officer as well, but nonetheless it looked like he could have been show boating for her. Either way the conduct of this officer was out of line.

We asked why he had pulled up behind us and what we could help him with and he said, “this looks suspicious.” When we asked why, he just asked if were friends and whether we knew each other? Why, I thought to myself would he ask that and why did this look suspicious?

Maine State PoliceWe told him what we were doing, which was exactly what I already said we were doing. Simply picking up an old dryer out of the ditch. So, the officer then and all the while had an attitude and had a rude tone of voice. Next, he asked for our ID’s like we were common criminals. It was obvious what we were up to and that was far from suspicious.

He then got back into his cruiser and proceeded to take at least 15-20 minutes to run three background checks. Upon returning from his cruiser, he said we all “checked out,” but wanted to know why we all were “shaking” and “acting nervous.”. Now this came as a surprise to all of us. My uncle said that we weren’t and that he is wrong.

Meanwhile, while he was in his car, we continued to secure the dryer, talk, laugh, and joke with one another, like we normally would with or without him there. However, he told us we were wrong and that we were acting nervous. At this time, I was getting annoyed with the arrogant rude, behavior of this man.

I said, “if anyone was to be nervous from the presence of an officer it would be from watching the news lately.” I was referring to all the police shootings of unarmed civilians lately. But, before I could elaborate on this further, Trooper Bronson said sharply, “oh, you mean civilians shooting police officers!”

He obviously knew that I was getting frustrated with him, so it seemed as though he was trying to anger me. My uncle noticed this and told me not to talk about that sore subject and told the officer that I didn’t mean anything by bringing up the news. However, Trooper Bronson then looked at me and said that I was starting trouble. Now did he forget about my freedom of speech? And how to treat people?

He then asked where we was heading to and we replied Skowhegan. Then he asked us, “what’s in Skowhegan?” That’s a pointless question, since he is from Troop C which is located in Skowhegan. He knows damn well what’s there. Then asked what by then we all knew he would eventually ask. “Do any of you have in your possession any illegal substances or marijuana that we weren’t supposed to have.”

What mades me angry thus far into this encounter was:

  1. The accusation of looking suspicious in the broad daylight on the side of a busy main roadway.
  2. The blatant rudeness and badgering in order to anger and coax us into misconduct that could lead to an arrest
  3. Purposely talking down to and humiliating us in public and in front of the lady in his car, and finally
  4. Automatically assuming we have illegal substances. Not everybody in this state is on drugs and up to no good.

So, after the question was asked, we all answered, “no.” And he then asked again while saying, “so if I was to search your vehicle I would find nothing illegal?” We had just said we didn’t have anything, so why treat us like lying children and ask that question? Makes no sense to me or anyone else in the situation.

The officer then asked if I would consent to a search of my vehicle. I was already really annoyed and disappointed with this officer’s behavior and said, “no sir you may not search my vehicle. I do not give you consent to do that.” He then got very angry and said, “K, that tells me what I need to know. That tells me that you have drugs in that vehicle, but you have your right to say no.”

Now correct me if I’m wrong, but as an officer of the law, if he knew that I had drugs or any illegal substances in my vehicle he would have searched it anyway, right? If there were drugs in my vehicle and he knew it, he would have confiscated them and I would have been under arrest.

Police HarassmentSo, his statement that because I refused to let him search my vehicle he knew that there were drugs in my vehicle was childish and completely uncalled for. Also, it was not professional at all. It was at this point that I realized that this wasn’t a public service or a protecting the public encounter…that this was harassment.

So, I then said, “can we go?” He replied, “yes” and I told him have a nice day and to drive safe. We all got back into my truck and and drove off, while he stayed behind us. Then about ten minutes into our drive we passed an unmarked cruiser. This tells me he called in to see if he could cause more trouble for us. I assume he was angered by me exercising my rights and not consenting to the search.

I will end this by saying that my uncle, my boss, and I have nothing, but respect, for officers of the law. But Trooper Eric Bronson’s behavior did not reflect the standard of professionalism the state police should have and that all the others I have met have had. In fact, I haven’t, until today, met an officer as rude, belittling, and unprofessional as he was. Impress the ladies on your own time Trooper Bronson. Shape up and protect and serve, don’t belittle, harass, and humiliate just because you wear a uniform.

– Louis C. Johnson III